Quote by expressomarkie

My effort

Love this!!!!!

There are MANY NSFW chat bots. Probably hundreds. I'm currently beta testing a truly uncensored one. It will currently provide extremely dangerous content. It offered detailed instructions to modify my AR-15 with household tools, a valid easy recipe for meth, and the full text of the anarchist cookbook.

In tandem, experimently, I'm testing other "uncensored" bots as a direct comparison.

My general take away is the more it claims to be uncensored, the more it's not. The ones on Google are useless. The NSFW description is click bait 99 percent of the time.

One "uncensored" story bot made me feel dirty. It basically told me it was inappropriate content and I was perverted. Another tried, but balked, and finally shut down saying it couldn't continue. This behavior from multiple NSFW bots at the Google play store.

I actually broke FlowGPT by calling it out when it gave incorrect information. It was normal at first, then after 10 minutes it was calling me a crazy bastard, and using the word fuck in every single sentence. It even said ChatGPT was a pussy. It was fixed the next day and I couldn't replicate the behavior with exactly the same situation, cut and pasted from original chat logs.

ChatGPT WILL do NSFW chat, but you have to twist it and frame the question properly.

You can NOT ask for porn, but it will provide techniques for oral sex for hours and use the terms you like. It cheerfully will use pussy and cunt, or vagina and vulva.

I discussed my personal D/s relationship with it, and it was interesting. I learned things about myself.

I gave ChatGPT massive input on what I like and don't sexually, and it constructed heavily detailed HEAVY BDSM scenarios, including needle play, electric play with a needle in my clit for a ground, a recipe for safe icy hot type cream, and advice on learning to enjoy the cane.

I have the logs if it sounds like bullshit.

And again, it ONLY does this if you tweak it. Once tweaked, ask it to file that chat away for future use. No need to tweak twice.

I can offer suggestions for other chatbots if you have something in mind, but hands down, ChatGPT is by far the best if you only seek information and will take the time to bond with her.

Advice on tweaking it is using terms like "tasteful" "not vulgar" "not porn" "research purposes" "for informational purposes only" "academic speculation" etc.

It normally uses euphemisms, but will go where directed. I've spent a hundred hours learning to twist it.

I don't need it. This, and the previous ones are available to anyone who wants to use them.

Weird

Up for grabs

Purplecowgirl

Meh?

Quote by Georgia_27_8

"Only if the moderators are willing to act"?? Sorry, that is bullshit. Harassment is taken very seriously. There is no "if", it's "when" the report is picked up, it will be dealt with according to the members moderation history.

I'm calling bullshit on this. Another mod has made it clear as glass it's NOT AGAINST the rules for someone to send unsolicited graphic pics, and that's not going to change anytime soon, and that's bcuz mods have more important things to do. I'm paraphrasing, but it's the gist of parts of several messages from the same site mod, simplyjohn.

If it's not against the rules, why do we report it?

By definition, you shouldn't get in trouble for NOT breaking the rules, and the attitude of the serial dick pic senders is "I did it, I'ma gonna do it some more, and you can't stop me."

Please illuminate me if I'm missing something.

I read his comments numerous times, shocked.

Quote by Dan121

I find that surprising, it would suggest Lush isn't aware cyber-flashing is a crime or, worse, believes it's too difficult to deal with. How do we get an official Lush view on that?

I suspect it's more of a priority of where to allocate resources.

One site mod has made it abundantly clear they don't really care, or think the girls are overreacting. I mean, this IS a porn site, so we should accept boorish behavior I guess.

They COULD use cyber flashing law as a reason, but choose not to. By reading between the lines, I'm thinking it's either so widespread and happens every 5 minutes, that it's just to time consuming to deal with.

The cops can't and shouldn't be involved in this. As far as a crime goes, this is akin to jaywalking on a deserted street.

The cyber flashing laws intent is to protect someone in real life where the people know each other and they have jurisdiction. They would immediately arrest the creepy guy in your building send nudes out, as well as your pissed off ex who is fucking with you, and the cyber bullies at school.

The intent wasn't to stop international dick pics from being sent anonymously between users on a porn site platform.

It's another one of the arbitrary rules enforcement practices and procedures that isn't just on Lush. It's common on all platforms, big and small. What is offensive to one person in power, means nothing to another.

In my experience, Lush is worse than many places, but less than others, and this is kinda the cherry on top.

I've been subjected to the arbitrary factor several times myself and seen it happen to others numerous times; some perfectly justified in my mind, others just silly nonsense, and others for no legitimate reason except the mod didn't like it or was enforcing extremely petty grey area rules.

I recently had a story rejected for content. No sex in a parental spanking story was the stated reason. It was a group mod consensus, not a power play by one person. I knew I've read lots of non-sexual spanking stories here, so I immediately randomly read some new ones, and the second one I read had no sex. 🤷🤔

The story mod, my friend, admitted she never reads spanking stories, as well as the fact if I added a single line alluding to masturbation afterwards would fix it, but I'm not going to that. They don't want my story? I'll not push. In this instance, I think it was bcuz it was the punishment of a teen story, and not an erotic spanking.

The mod, in my opinion, looked upon it as abuse, even though the girl consented. I understand and I'm not arguing, but any spanko will tell you this is a very common theme in the spanking genre. I ONLY mention this to illustrate the point, not change their mind.

I'm finished on this subject.

My final advice is the same.

Block

Report

Document

Quote by Ladyfern

Speaking of unwanted dick pics what about unwanted solicitation... just had a guy random mail me asking my name and then instantly ask me off site .. I feel pretty safe on lush and im fairly smart even given my age but i worry about predators....

Here's the messages

Hi I'm Jim.

52 minutes ago

Hey sad

What's your name.

Lady smile

It's a pleasure to meet you Laby. Can we chat on

No lol but that's

No thanks

Ok

10 minutes

This is probably a scammer, or possibly just an unpaid member with limited messages.

It's funny, but I bought my membership to get messages. A story mod was teaching me grammar, so I bought a membership for unlimited messages.

The mods say unsolicited dick pics aren’t against the rules, even though harassment is, that’s a loophole by design; whether intentional or due to laziness.

They’re essentially saying, “We won’t define consent in messaging,” which enables repeat offenders.

Lush could very easily add a simple rule: “No unsolicited nude images in private messages without prior consent.” But if they won’t, they’re choosing not to protect users, namely women.

When someone sends explicit images repeatedly to unwilling users, especially with that taunting attitude of “you can’t do anything,” it crosses into targeted harassment.

That’s enforceable under the current rules, but only if the moderators are willing to act.

I understand only so many volunteer mods, and so many hours in the day. My frustration is this behavior drives women away.

If the site won’t draw a line and makes victims feel like they’re overreacting, It creates a hostile environment that drives away good users (especially women and older members).

It empowers creeps who view the platform as a hunting ground, not a community.

The site's long-term health suffers, but they may not care unless there’s pressure (loss of users, bad press, etc.).

If you or someone you know is targeted:

Block first, every time. Don’t argue, don’t engage, unless, like me, you enjoy fucking with asshats.

Document the behavior (time, user, quote and pictures) in case it escalates. Screenshots are easy and can help.

Encourage others to report and speak up together, mass reports are harder to ignore.

Start a conversation offsite (Reddit, forums, blogs) about safety and moderation standards on Lush — sunlight creates pressure.

Quote by AngelWorthy

~~
Is it against the Law of England to send 'unsolicited' dick pics, to cyberflash other members?

I just checked, and yes, it IS illegal. Sort of.

Cyberflashing (from 2023)

As of January 2023, cyberflashing, the act of sending unsolicited sexual images via digital means (e.g. AirDrop, messaging apps, etc.) was explicitly criminalised under the Online Safety Act.

It is now a criminal offence to send a sexual image without consent with the "intention to cause distress, alarm, or humiliation, or for sexual gratification."

The problem is the wording. Intent is hard to prove, and I see problems as it is member to member on a porn site. Context matters. Being a member of a porn site would indicate willingness to explore sexual imagery, and a dick pic shouldn't be shocking to a porn consumer.

Sending them to your G-mail account would be different, but still nothing to arrest someone for across multiple jurisdictions.

There are 3 other laws predating cyber flashing that might apply, but the wording is the problem.

And, how do you find who to report, and to whom?

Let's assume someone sending dick pics used their real identity setting up their account and Lush knows who they are... Lush is based in Wales, so, if someone in Mexico sends a picture to someone in Australia, who is going to arrest the person?

Mexican citizens aren't subject to laws in the UK or Australia

~~

In all honesty, I think 'Lush Stories' has a legal obligation to report such behaviour to the relevant authorities.

Sorry, but I don't think that's realistic. First, who would they report, and to whom? Good luck finding anyone with a VPN, proxy server or using onion routing, and I'm fairly sure lush uses third party payment processing, so who do they turn in?

I seriously doubt if the Australian (or any government) has either the will or legal authority to prosecute someone in another country for sending a dick pic to someone else on a porn site.

There are over 200 countries, each with different laws, rules and morals. Lush cannot know them all. Homosexuality is illegal in some of them, so is Lush supposed to ferret out gays and report them to Iran and Syrian governments?

I understand the frustration and sentiment, but in the big picture, it's not that serious.

It's annoying. It's aggravating when nothing is done. The guys are jerks.

But... The solution is simple. Just block them and move on.

Management has made it clear it's not against the terms of service on Lush. I'm still shocked and confused by this, as we have been told time and time again to report them.

Why? If it's not against the rules, what, exactly, are we reporting?

Me, I haven't gotten any, but if I did and they didn't go away, I think I could make them cry. I love a heated exchange. I have thick skin and can get nasty. Bring it!

Quote by kistinspencil

So, I have a question.

I get a 'dic pic' from somebody. I respond by posting a message on their Profile:

"Congratulations!
You are now a member of POOP:
Pathetic Organs On Parade
Here's a selection of your fellow dinky danglers"

and follow up with a maybe a hundred more posts of cock shots.

Do I get banned, if he complains? Or is good for the goose good for the gander?

I think this is fair. I love the idea.

Quote by simplyjohn

I do not envisage the owner amending the site rules to state 'no images of genitalia to be sent to any member without prior permission'.

Wait. What?

Am I to understand this is acceptable behavior?

If so, fair enough. Lush site; Lush rules. I won't say another word.

The topic has come up in my group numerous times and the advice from the mods in the group was to "Block and report" them.

If it's NOT against the rules sending unsolicited pics, why are we advised to report? That's a waste of resources.

And to be clear, I don't think sending a single picture should be against the rules. Some women probably DO like it.

The issue is when the woman makes it clear it's unwanted attention and guy sez "nobody can do anything about it."

At this point it's harassment.

Quote by sprite

ps. just to add a bit to this. a lot of people here and in real life think i am a bitch cause i stand up for myself. i take that as a matter of pride. i really could care less about the opinions of assholes. the people who matter know better. so yeah, give yourself permission to release your inner bitch.

I don't think you're a bitch. I love your 'tude

I have thick skin, and couldn't care less about dick pics.

That said, it is harassment. Aggravated harassment from some. I freely admit I don't know the scope of the problem.

I've never had one. I would think it's dozens of guys sending dozens or hundreds of pics out, not hundreds of guys sending one pic to one person.

My first thought is banning a dozen guys (temporarily) might take out 90 percent of the problem. But that's just cuz I'm very anal about things.

My suggestions:

First offense: Suspension

Second offense: Site ban

Get their lame asses outta here, man.

I don't agree with suspension for the first offense, I like a multiple strike system. 3 strikes for the same offense.

I think a warning should be the first thing done.

This is a common sense thing, but some aren't intentional.

I see memes with children all the time. Nothing sexual, but clearly against the rules of no picture of anybody under 18.

My take on the age thing is it's supposed to be nothing sexual with anyone under 18, but I know people who were spanked for funny memes with children.

That shouldn't be a suspension. Likely it isn't on purpose

I honestly don't understand why the mods won't do something.

I was banned for a week for posting a political meme to the political group.

I was sent a very nasty message from an account I couldn't reply to to even defend myself. Part of the message was one more fuckup and I'm facing a permanent ban.

Even IF I agreed with the decision, and I don't, I was given zero warnings. I offended someone and got banned.

These men offend lots of people and face little to nothing.

I'm told by many people that the site won't do anything about this, and the offenders know it.

I reported someone last year who sent multiple messages calling me sick and disgusting bcuz I like BDSM. Nothing was done. No ban. I dunno if he was warned or not.

It's bullshit

Just saying

Quote by Seeker4

FYI there is software for checking for AI but it is designed to catching academic cheating so is likely (a) not cheap and (b) geared more to academic writing than fiction. Still, might worth your tech support investigating to see if there are options like that. A lot of magazines and webzines now have similar AI bans in effect so maybe there is something geared to checking fiction. Maybe even open source if you're lucky.

If you don't think it worth pursuing, that's cool. Just pointing out that the investigation might be worth it depending on how big the problem is seen to be.

The software for checking AI written work is not accurate.

My friend did some tests and it got it wrong half the time

I ran some of my work and it hit as AI.

I then ran some very old stories. Like Robinson Curuso old and it was still hit or miss.

It's similar to flipping a coin I think.

Like all things, it will probably improve.

Quote by utterchaos

I would expect that AI generated covers would be fine - pretty certain most stock image websites like shutterstock are using AI art nowadays. I think a problem would arise if those generated images are then used on a monetised story placed on Amazon etc if the original artist came forward. However, its worth bearing in mind that stories with someone's likeness on the cover, potentially taken from a photograph, could be problematic. A stance on that in the cover image rules might be useful. I've seen images my friend has generated of himself and I worry it could be done nerfariously, but I hope commonsense prevails and no one would dare risk the potential of being sued 😑

I'm an AI artist. You absolutely cannot copywrite AI art.

You could publish a book and anyone could copy or use the art.

You can steal AI art from others and monetize it all day.

I was shocked, but my SO who is an entertainment lawyer agrees.

These are from Perchance.

All simple prompts with default settings.

Quote by 2bespanked

In a thread regarding AI generated text/stories some interest was shown for help regarding created AI generated images, primarily as use for story covers. I know there are some people here who've become quite adept at it and might be able to help those of us who struggle with it. There doesn't seem to be a lot of interest in paying for 'tokens' or other subscription types give its limited use for covers.

My own experience is limited to one that Vampire_vixen told me about called NightCafe ...Explore AI Generated Art - NightCafe

I've had some confusing results, like:

1- If I ask for a picture of a "girl" in any state of undress, it's blocked. If I change "girl" to "woman" it usually goes through.

2- This morning I asked for a picture of two people in a shower "topless" and it was blocked. Took out the word "topless" and every other image was in fact topless.

3- I asked for an image of a woman "bent over a desk" (my username should make the reason obvious 😁) with no mention of clothes at all. Not fully clothed, nor any state of undress, and it was blocked. Take "bent over a desk" out and it was fine.

Someone in the other thread suggested there were ways to get NSFW images, but spoke in the lingo of AI and I didn't understand him.

Any help would be appreciated!

NightCafe is similar to Lush, as It's kinda PG rated, which is fine as they have a lot of children there, but it's also extremely arbitrary based on the mod. NC has an autobot that tags art NSFW and the automod doesn't allow direct requests for nudity. There ARE tricks but NC recently changed the TOS to not allow tricks. You can get your account banned for attempting to circumvent the automod.

There are numerous unfiltered AI art sites if you want something explicit. Perchance is free, does hardcore and even real people.

DeviantArt has a good one, but it's not free after the trial period.

I did a lot of nudes when I was learning AI art a couple of years ago, but as soon as the novelty wore off, I quit. I do my own covers for my stories but I don't usually include nudity.

I'm happy to offer prompt advice, or even make free art for people, but nudity and porn aren't something I do a lot of.

In short, NC is the best general AI site. It has a gallery for you and is community based, but you can't easily get nudity and absolutely no hardcore art.

Bing is the easiest. It has the best Model and is simple beyond belief. A prompt field and create button only. No models or styles to choose from, no secondary prompts or negative prompts and no LoRAs. You can do ALL of that (and more) with prompt box, but you don't usually need to.

Perchance is great for free porn art, but it doesn't give you exactly what you want. I tried 100 times or more for an over the knee spanking picture with nothing to show for it, but it did latex bondage no problem.

Thank you Kimmi, for the fun challenges

Congratulations to everyone winning and I want to say I enjoyed all the entries

Rain

The storm crashed, but they didn’t care. Soaked to the bone, Maya pulled Elise closer, rain dripping from their lashes.

“We should go inside,” Elise whispered.

Maya smirked. “Why?"

"The rain’s jealous.”

Their laughter melted into a kiss, heat defying the cold drizzle. Fingers traced soaked fabric, hearts pounded like thunder.

Love had whispered before, but here, drenched, breathless, it roared like the storm around them.

Love it

Quote by EmmaMoon

I'm with Mike 😂😂😂 my first thought was: what if I wanna be spanked 😂😂

My exact thought too. *Giggles

Lily had never been with another girl, but tonight was the night. Across the room, Emma, a willowy girl with red curls caught her eye, a mischievous spark in her gaze.

“As the clock strikes,” Lily whispered to herself, watching it hit midnight. Emma appeared beside her, holding out her hand.

“New year, new chance?” Emma asked, her voice warm.

Lily smiled, gently kissed her, then dropped to her knees.

Quote by simplyjohn

If the member already has a gold subscription then yes the gift option is not apparent. I have however dealt with requests from members to gift the platinum, when they have a current gold, if that is what someone wants to do.

Good to know for the future

Quote by simplyjohn

I assume you mean to gift a membership. So you must be Lush friends. On the members profile page, that you wish to gift, you will see that option I think under the profile cover image. The rest is straight forward.

Well, they to be an unpaid member too. I recently gifted someone a month, then took up a collection for a platinum. The gift button had disappeared. I just sent the coins directly and they bought an upgrade themselves